<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "Wedge Defaults"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.hirekogolf.com/jforum/posts/13.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "Wedge Defaults"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Wedge Defaults</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ With the trend toward stronger lofts in irons, have you considered a change from the old standard of 52/56/60 lofts in wedges?  Maybe 50/54/58 as wedge lofts offered.   For myself, I use 50/53/56 as I haven't yet been able to handle the 60 loft.  With a 46/47 loft pitching wedge there is a 5 to 6 gap up to the default 52 gap wedge.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.hirekogolf.com/jforum/posts/533#2411.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.hirekogolf.com/jforum/posts/533#2411.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 27 May 2007 08:31:51]]></pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ anonymous]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Wedge Defaults</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ In some of our sets of irons, we offer a GW to fill the loft discrepency.  However, it is the least sold of the offerings, surprisingly less than 3-irons.  Go figure!!!  There is idea on our design board that may tackle this situation, but we have to be confident that the clubs will sell with those lofts.<br> <br> Sincerely,<br> <br> Jeff Summitt]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.hirekogolf.com/jforum/posts/533#2414.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.hirekogolf.com/jforum/posts/533#2414.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 May 2007 04:33:48]]></pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Jeff Summitt]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
